I've always thought that the Cadfael series had as a major
theme the beauty
and rightness of young love, that Cadfael would do just
about anything
(including lying and stealing) to protect the young
lovers. That attitude
shows him to be able to -- within a fairly rigidly
rule-bound system (both
the society and his monastic order)-- choose his
own path, to choose a value
above obedience, and also, despite
monasticism and celibacy, to connect to
the life-giving force of romance
and sex. Ellis Peters is such a graceful
writer, she was able to show him
being almost gooey (my term :) about his
young-couple friends, while
maintaining his necessarily sleuthly
distance.
Murder mysteries are so much about death (of course), but what
I've
always loved about Cadfael is that stubborn connection to life.
Then
again (I love the Cadfael books devotedly, so get a bit gooey
myself),
that echoes the other major contrast of the sacred and the profane,
the
profane being the human-- the interactions with the other monks
and
priests, the town beyond the walls, the civil war raging beyond
that,
Cadfael's own checquered past.
I'm not sure anyone did better
than EP at finding the teeming sensual
life within the mystery setting.
Alicia (who must now embark on another re-read....)
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
Sunday, June 8, 2014
Historical fiction, or historical contemporary fiction?
Historical fiction written as historical fiction: Georgette Heyer writing about the Regency, a century or more past her own time.
Then there's Jane Austen writing about her own time... but it's historical for US.
Benefits:
Jane Austen will -- being steeped in it-- probably be faithfully representing the culture and especially language as she perceives it. But she will be blinkered by a narrow perspective and of course the lack of ability to research different viewpoints or see what happens after her own time.
Historical fiction-- greater context, more distance, more understanding of the causes and effects. But the colloquialism of the language might be suspect-- replicating conversations which were not "heard".
Then there's Jane Austen writing about her own time... but it's historical for US.
Benefits:
Jane Austen will -- being steeped in it-- probably be faithfully representing the culture and especially language as she perceives it. But she will be blinkered by a narrow perspective and of course the lack of ability to research different viewpoints or see what happens after her own time.
Historical fiction-- greater context, more distance, more understanding of the causes and effects. But the colloquialism of the language might be suspect-- replicating conversations which were not "heard".
Class structure, snobbery, class conflict
In 4:50 from Paddington, Miss Marple refers to an estate owned by a wealthy family. With something like disdain, she says, "Not one of our... families. Victorian millionaires." She goes on to remember that the family fortune is based on cookies: "Crackenthorpe's Fancies. Silly name for a biscuit, I've always thought."
Sunday, May 18, 2014
British Fiction
Agatha Christie...
Ellis Peters...
Georgette Heyer
Susan Howatch
Dorothy Dunnett...
British... or just writing about Britain.
Ellis Peters...
Georgette Heyer
Susan Howatch
Dorothy Dunnett...
British... or just writing about Britain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)